Southampton City Vision Local Plan Chapter 6 - Transport and Movement
Transport and Movement
Summary of responses (84 received)
Theme: Transport and Movement
Policy Name: Transport and Movement
Policy Number: TR1(S)
Options Y/N: N
In total 84 comments were received, 40 on the policy text and 44 on the overall approach. No options were proposed within this policy, the focus being to align with the Local Transport Plan and support sustainable growth.
There is no clear level of agreement or disagreement with many comments being mixed. There is support for the principle of prioritising active transport, public transport and reducing car use, particularly in the City Centre. Many comments also link to issues of climate change, zero carbon targets and reducing traffic congestion and air pollution.
However, whilst people support the theory many feel that in practice this is more difficult for a number of reasons.
Many said cycling is challenging because cycle paths are not present on all routes, with huge disconnects across the city. Comments were made on safety of cycle routes and for some a feeling that they are dominated by ‘speedy commuter cyclists’ making it intimidating for other cyclists. With regard for public transport the majority felt it was not adequate to deter car use. Issues raised included a lack of connectivity across the city, affordability, the need to make better use of local trains stations, integrated ticket systems, water buses and taxis, and some supporting the suggestion of a mass transit system.
Whilst there is a great deal of general support for the approach and policy some comments show clear disagreement. Most notable are those highlighting the need for cars, the majority recognising this is an issue for older people of those with accessibility needs. Other comments were stronger is saying everyone has the right to choose their mode of transport, cars are essential and more parking is necessary.
A number of comments included quite specific ideas/suggestions about particular parts of the city, the most notable was concern about closure of some City Centre streets such as Portland Terrace and East Park Terrace. Some felt overall there was too much focus on the City Centre to the detriment of the rest of the city.