Decision details

Conversion of the City's Three PFI Schools to Academy Status

Decision Maker: Cabinet

Decision status: Recommendations Approved

Is Key decision?: Yes

Is subject to call in?: Yes

Purpose:

To consider the report of the CYP Strategic Commissioning, Education and Inclusion Manager, outlining the potential risks to the Council that could arise as a result of the city’s three PFI Schools (Cantell, Redbridge and Woodlands) converting to academy status.   In particular, the financial cost that the Council could incur if one of the schools/academies breached the PFI contract, resulting in compensation having to be paid to the PFI provider, which has been assessed as low risk.

 

Decision:

To note and accept the risks associated with the conversion of Cantell, Redbridge and Woodlands (the three PFI schools) to academy status.

Reasons for the decision:

This report is being brought forward to members to enable the academy transfers to proceed, having due regard to the changes to the management of the contractual and financial risks to the Council that will be a direct result of the transfer.

Alternative options considered:

  1. The Council have debated this issue with the DfE for several months. However, ultimately the DfE has indicated that it is not willing to change its current position and deviate from the standard wording of the PFI academy conversion documents, believing that by virtue of the DfE’s ability to control the Academy, the Council would be sufficiently indirectly protected. The Council could continue to challenge this. However, doing so would need to be considered against the backdrop that attempts thus far to get the DfE to change its position have proved fruitless and that the chances of events taking such a course as to actually trigger a termination and the Council becoming obliged to pay the associated termination sum are practically very slim. As such, there seems little point in pursuing this further.
  2. The Council’s independent legal advice is clear that the Secretary of State could insist on forcing these conversions through. The Council’s only right of challenge would be by a judicial review to establish that the Secretary of State had acted unreasonably in insisting on these transfers on such terms despite our concerns. Notwithstanding the significant costs involved nor the other practical consequences of so doing, it is not possible to predict with any certainty how successful such a challenge would be.

Report author: Alison Alexander

Publication date: 18/06/2013

Date of decision: 18/06/2013

Decided at meeting: 18/06/2013 - Cabinet

Effective from: 27/06/2013

Accompanying Documents: