Decision Maker: Cabinet
Decision status: Recommendations Approved
Is Key decision?: Yes
Is subject to call in?: Yes
Purpose:
To consider the report of the CYP Strategic
Commissioning, Education and Inclusion Manager, outlining the
potential risks to the Council that could arise as a result of the
city’s three PFI Schools (Cantell, Redbridge and Woodlands)
converting to academy status.
In particular, the financial cost
that the Council could incur if one of the schools/academies
breached the PFI contract, resulting in compensation having to be
paid to the PFI provider, which has been assessed as low risk.
Decision:
To note and accept the risks associated with
the conversion of Cantell, Redbridge
and Woodlands (the three PFI schools) to academy status.
Reasons for the decision:
This report is being brought forward to
members to enable the academy transfers to proceed, having due
regard to the changes to the management of the contractual and
financial risks to the Council that will be a direct result of the
transfer.
Alternative options considered:
- The Council have debated this issue
with the DfE for several months.
However, ultimately the DfE has
indicated that it is not willing to change its current position and
deviate from the standard wording of the PFI academy conversion
documents, believing that by virtue of the DfE’s ability to control the Academy, the
Council would be sufficiently indirectly protected. The Council
could continue to challenge this. However, doing so would need to
be considered against the backdrop that attempts thus far to get
the DfE to change its position have
proved fruitless and that the chances of events taking such a
course as to actually trigger a termination and the Council
becoming obliged to pay the associated termination sum are
practically very slim. As such, there seems little point in
pursuing this further.
- The Council’s independent
legal advice is clear that the Secretary of State could insist on
forcing these conversions through. The Council’s only right
of challenge would be by a judicial review to establish that the
Secretary of State had acted unreasonably in insisting on these
transfers on such terms despite our concerns. Notwithstanding the
significant costs involved nor the other practical consequences of
so doing, it is not possible to predict with any certainty how
successful such a challenge would be.
Report author: Alison Alexander
Publication date: 18/06/2013
Date of decision: 18/06/2013
Decided at meeting: 18/06/2013 - Cabinet
Effective from: 27/06/2013
Accompanying Documents: